Wise v. Lappin et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 32 Report and Recommendation. Deft Surapeneni's 19 Motion to Dismiss is granted with respect to the claim against him in his official capacity and denied with respect to the claim against him in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/21/13. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION TIMOTHY SCOTT WISE § VS. § HARLEY G. LAPPIN, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11cv148 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Timothy Scott Wise, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court. Defendant Surapaneni filed a motion to dismiss (doc. no. 19). The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the motion be granted with respect to the claim asserted against defendant Surapaneni in his official capacity and denied with respect to the claim asserted against him in his individual capacity. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Defendant Surapaneni’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to the claim asserted against him in his official capacity and DENIED with respect to the claim asserted against him in his individual capacity. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21 day of March, 2013. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?