Santos v. Martin
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this petition be dismissed. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 1/3/12. (mrp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CARLOS SANTOS,
Petitioner,
versus
M. MARTIN,
Respondent.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-536
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Petitioner Carlos Santos, an inmate confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in
Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court
referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for
consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge concerning the petition. The magistrate judge recommends the petition be
dismissed.
The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,
along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed objections to the
Report and Recommendation.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections asserted by petitioner. After
careful consideration, the court is of the opinion that the objections are without merit. The
grounds for review asserted by petitioner do not provide him with a basis for relief in this
proceeding.
ORDER
Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED.
The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is
.
ADOPTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing the petition.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 3rd day of January, 2012.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?