Turner v. Strad Energy Services USA LTD et al

Filing 49

MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Court grant Turner's motion for remand. This action is remanded to the 356th Judicial District Court of Hardin County, Texas. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/10/12. (mrp, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
LARRY W. TURNER, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
NATIONAL RESPONSE
CORPORATION et al.,
Defendants.

EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-64

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Larry W. Turner (“Turner”) originally filed this on-the-job injury lawsuit in the
356th Judicial District Court of Hardin County, Texas, alleging negligence pursuant to the Jones
Act, and negligence and unseaworthiness pursuant to general maritime law. (Doc. No. 1, Ex. B)
(initial pleading). On February 10, 2012, Defendant Strad Energy Services USA Ltd. (“Strad”)
filed a “Petition for Removal” to this Court on the grounds that the Court had original jurisdiction
under 43 U.S.C. § 1349(b)(1) (Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act), and that Turner fraudulently
pled he was a Jones Act seaman. (Doc. No. 1.) On March 12, 2012, Turner filed his “Motion
to Remand” (Doc. No. 26), in which he argued that remand is required because: (1) he brought
a plausible Jones Act case in state court, and (2) this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
Thereafter, the Court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States
Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management pursuant to an Order of Reference entered on May 20,
2012. (Doc. No. 39.)
On August 17, 2012, the United States magistrate judge filed his report (Doc. No. 47)
recommending that the Court grant Turner’s motion for remand. Strad filed objections (Doc.

No. 48) to the report and recommendation on August 31, 2012. Pursuant to these objections, the
Court has conducted a de novo review of the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the magistrate
judge correctly determined that Turner’s motion to remand was timely filed, that Turner has
shown a possibility of establishing a Jones Act claim on the merits, and that this case should be
remanded. Consequently, Strad’s objections are without merit.
It is ORDERED that Strad’s objections (Doc. No. 48) are OVERRULED, the report of
the magistrate judge is ADOPTED, and Turner’s “Motion to Remand” (Doc. No. 28) is
granted. . This action is remanded to the 356th Judicial District Court of Hardin County, Texas.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.

SIGNED at Sherman, Texas, this 10th day of September, 2012.

________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2