Sheppard v. Livingston et al
Filing
111
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION regarding 101 Report and Recommendations. The objections filed by plaintiff are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/20/14. (dlc, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD,
Plaintiff,
versus
BRAD LIVINGSTON, et al.,
Defendants.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-169
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Curtis Lee Sheppard, an inmate confined at the Michael Unit of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this
civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court previously referred this matter to the
Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration
pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction. The magistrate judge has
submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning the motion.
The magistrate judge recommends the motion be denied.
The court has received the Report and Recommendation, along with the record, pleadings,
and all available evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation, as well as amended objections.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and
the applicable law. After careful consideration, the court is of the opinion plaintiff’s objections
are without merit. While this lawsuit involves events which occurred at the Stiles Unit, plaintiff’s
motion complains of events which occurred at the Michael Unit and which do not involve the
named defendants. Any relief plaintiff seeks concerning events at the Michael Unit should be
pursued in a separate lawsuit. Events at the Michael Unit do not provide a basis for preliminary
injunctive relief in this lawsuit.
ORDER
Accordingly, the objections filed by plaintiff are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is
ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED.
.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 20th day of August, 2014.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?