Richard v. Kelly
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 99 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/26/15. (mrp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
LARRY WAYNE RICHARD,
Plaintiff,
versus
DONALD R. KELLY, et al.,
Defendants.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-294
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND
ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Larry Wayne Richard, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit in Beaumont, Texas,
proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Donald R. Kelly,
Jean B. Arabie, Travis L. Caldwell, Christopher D. Robinson, and Angelique N. Dennis.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends the motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Angelique
N. Dennis be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available
evidence. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. This
requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See
FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff’s objections are
without merit.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED.
The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is
ADOPTED. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Angelique N. Dennis is
GRANTED.
Signed this date.
Mar 26, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?