Welch v. Jefferson County Court et al

Filing 11

ORDER adopting 9 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/21/13. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION RICHARD D. WELCH § VS. § JEFFERSON COUNTY COURT, ET AL., § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12-CV-330 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Richard D. Welch, a former pre-trial detainee confined at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the following defendants: Jefferson County Court, Jefferson County District Attorney Tom Maness, Jefferson County Assistant District Attorney Ramon Rodriguez, and State District Judge Layne Walker. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this civil rights case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.1 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered 1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned with the notation “Return to Sender, Attempted – Not Known – Unable to Forward.” See Docket Entry No. 10. in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 21 So ORDERED and SIGNED on July ____, 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?