United States of America v. Contreras et al
Filing
101
ORDER adopting 98 Amended Report and Recommendation and granting in part 79 Motion for Summary Judgment against Efigenio Contreras. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 4/15/20. (tkd, )
Case 1:12-cv-00476-MAC-ZJH Document 101 Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1155
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
versus
EFIGENIO A CONTRERAS,
Defendant.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00476-MAC
ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING
IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST
EFIGENIO CONTRERAS
Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”) filed this lawsuit against Defendants
Efigenio A. Contreras and Laura Denise Contreras (“the Contrerases”) to, among other things,
reduce to judgment the Contrerases’ federal income tax liabilities, to foreclose its federal tax
liens against certain property, and for a judicial sale of the property. On March 3, 2020, the court
granted the agreed judgment between the United States and Ms. Contreras, and Ms. Contreras is
no longer a party to this case. Doc. No. 94. On March 25, 2020, United States Magistrate Judge
Zack Hawthorn entered an amended report (Doc. No. 98) which recommended granting in part the
United States’ “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 79) against Efigenio Contreras. Mr.
Contreras failed to file objections to the magistrate judge’s amended report and recommendation,
and the time for doing so has passed.
Case 1:12-cv-00476-MAC-ZJH Document 101 Filed 04/15/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1156
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s amended report and
recommendation (Doc. No. 98) is ADOPTED. Accordingly, the United States’ “Motion for
Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 79) is GRANTED IN PART.
A final judgment will be entered separately.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 15th day of April, 2020.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?