Ingram et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/10/12. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
formally known as The Bank of New York,
as Trustee For The Certificateholders of
the CWABS Inc, Asset-Backed Certificates,
Series 2006-19, its Successors and/or Assigns, '
LAWRENCE J. INGRAM, et al.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, for all pretrial matters pursuant to General Order 05-07.
Thereafter, the case was
transferred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial
management (Doc. No. 4). On October 19, 2012, Judge Hawthorn entered an order directing pro
se Plaintiff Lawrence J. Ingram (“Ingram”) to pay the applicable filing fee or submit a new in
forma pauperis application within seven days, or risk dismissal of this action. (Doc. No. 5.)
Ingram failed to comply within seven days as ordered. Therefore, on November 2, 2012, the
magistrate judge entered a report (Doc. No. 7) recommending the Court dismiss this action sua
sponte for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. Ingram has filed no
objections to the report and recommendation, nor has he paid the applicable filing fee or submitted
a new in forma pauperis application as originally ordered by the magistrate judge. The Court’s
independent review confirms that the magistrate judge’s analysis is correct.
Page 1 of 2
The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is ADOPTED, and this
lawsuit is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final judgment will be entered separately.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 10 day of December, 2012.
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?