The Bank of New York Mellon v. Ingram
Filing
28
ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 report and recommendation and granting 4 Motion to Remand. Ordered that this lawsuit is remanded to the Justice Court of Jefferson County, Texas Precinct 1, Place 1. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 6/11/2013. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON,
formally known as The Bank of New York,
as Trustee For The Certificateholders of
the CWABS Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates,
Series 2006-19, its Successors and/or Assigns
v.
LAWRENCE J. INGRAM, and/or
all occupants of 7729 Pecan Drive,
Beaumont, TX 77713
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
NO. 1:12-CV-483
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court referred this case to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, pursuant to General Order 05-07. Thereafter, the case was transferred the Honorable Zack
Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial management. (Doc. No. 8.) Pending
before the Court is the Plaintiff’s “Motion to Remand.” (Doc. No. 4.) The Court has received
and considered the report (Doc. No. 26) of the magistrate judge, who recommends that the Court
grant the “Motion to Remand” and remand this case to the Justice Court of Jefferson County,
Texas, Precinct 1, Place 1. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed.
The Court’s independent review confirms that the magistrate judge’s analysis is correct.
It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 26)
is ADOPTED and the Plaintiff’s “Motion to Remand” (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that this lawsuit is REMANDED to the Justice Court of Jefferson County, Texas,
Precinct 1, Place 1.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11 day of June, 2013.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?