Hardy v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 12/11/12. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION DAVID MARK HARDY § VS. § ERNEST GONZALEZ, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:12cv559 MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE Plaintiff David Mark Hardy, an inmate confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this lawsuit pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1964, against several individual defendants. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1965(a) provides that any civil action or proceeding brought pursuant to the RICO act against any person may be instituted in the district court of the United States for any district in which such person resides, is found, has an agent, or transacts his affairs. The individuals named as defendants in this lawsuit appear to predominantly reside in Lamar County, Texas. As a result, venue is proper in this court. However, Lamar County is located within the Sherman Division of this court, rather than the Beaumont Division. None of the defendants appear to reside in a county located within the Beaumont Division or appear to have an agent or conduct his or her affairs within the Beaumont Division. As a result, this matter will be transferred to the Sherman Division of this court. A transfer order so providing shall be entered. Hello This is a Test SIGNED this 11 December day of , 2012. KEITH F. GIBLIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?