Livingston et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss # 46 is granted. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/11/14. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIKE LIVINGSTON and SHARON LIVINGSTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee for Carrington Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 1006-NC4 Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC, and CARRINGTON FORECLOSURE SERVICES, LLC f/k/a Atlantic & Pacific Foreclosure Services, LLC. Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-229 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The court referred this case to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for pretrial proceedings. (Doc. No. 22.) Pending before the court is the Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss.” (Doc. No. 46.) The court has received and considered the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 62), recommending that the court grant the Defendants’ motion. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. It is therefore ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (Doc. No. 57) is ADOPTED; and the Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 46) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Mike Livingston and Sharon Livingston’s claims are dismissed with prejudice. The unnamed class members’ claims are dismissed without prejudice. A final judgment will be entered separately. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 11th day of September, 2014. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?