King v. Marshell

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 3 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Thad Heartfield on 6/4/2013. (bjc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION DEREK KING § VS. § MS. MARSHELL, CO V § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-290 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Derek King, an inmate formerly confined at the Mark Stiles Unit with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant CO V Marshell. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this civil rights lawsuit be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.1 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered 1 Plaintiff filed correspondence with the Court on May 15, 2013 which was docketed as a supplement to his complaint. See docket entry no. 5. After a review of the correspondence, the Court also construes this as a supplement to his complaint as plaintiff provided additional factual information regarding his attempt to exhaust his administrative remedies and collect $100.00 from TDCJ-CID. in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. SIGNED this the 4 day of June, 2013. ____________________________ Thad Heartfield United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?