Gurrola v. Bowles et al

Filing 80

ORDER adopting 41 and 77 Report and Recommendations. Defts' 54 and 67 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 7/16/16. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION JOSE ANTONIO GURROLA § VS. § SCHUYLER LEVIAS, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-388 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff Jose Antonio Gurrola, a prisoner confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Schuyler Levias, Rockella Neal, Officer Collins, Dr. Bean, and Kevin Bowles. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the claims against defendants Collins and Bean for want of prosecution. The Magistrate Judge also recommends granting the motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Levias, Neal, and Bowles. The court has received and considered the Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the reports of the Magistrate Judge (document nos. 41 and 77) are ADOPTED. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (document nos. 54 and 67) are GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. So Ordered and Signed Jul 16, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?