Salazar v. Wallace et al
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. It is ordered that plaintiff's claims against defendant Rudolfo Carrizal are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 3/1/17. (mrp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOLOMON SALAZAR,
Plaintiff,
versus
DARREN B. WALLACE, et al.,
Defendants.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-447
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Solomon Salazar, an inmate confined at the Stiles Unit, proceeding pro se, brought
this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s claims against defendant Rudolfo Carrizal be
dismissed without prejudice.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available
evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
were filed by the parties.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are
correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.1 Accordingly, it is
1
Plaintiff filed a motion for ineffective service (#60) and a motion to dismiss defendant Carrizal without prejudice (#61). Plaintiff’s
motions are granted. Therefore, the report will be adopted to the extent it recommended dismissal.
ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant Rudolfo Carrizal are DISMISSED
.
without prejudice.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of March, 2017.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?