Dickerson v. Zeno et al
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/15/14. (mrp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
HAROLD DICKERSON, JR.,
Plaintiff,
versus
LAURA G. ZENO, et al.,
Defendants.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13-CV-568
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Harold Dickerson, Jr., a prisoner currently confined at the Scott Unit of the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Laura G. Zeno, Timothy T. Spikes, David
E. Jones, Sheryl A. Mizell, Alvin C. Bonface, Yolanda F. Nelson, and Carolyn C. Mayo.
The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United
States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and
orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends granting defendants’ motion to dismiss
for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available
evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
were filed by the parties.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are
correct, and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate
.
judge’s recommendation.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 15th day of September, 2014.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?