Dickerson v. Mizell et al
Filing
6
ORDER overruling objections and adopting 2 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 3/25/14. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
HAROLD DICKERSON, JR.
§
VS.
§
SHERYL A. MIZELL, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv576
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Harold Dickerson, Jr., an inmate confined at the Larry Gist State Jail, proceeding
pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff lists seven
prison officials as defendants.
The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giiblin, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable
orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge concerning this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends the lawsuit be
dismissed without prejudice as repetitious.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report
and Recommendation.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections. After careful consideration, the
court is of the opinion that the objections are without merit. The Magistrate Judge correctly
concluded that the claims asserted in this lawsuit are repetitious of the claims asserted in civil action
number 1:13cv568.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is
ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with the
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25 day of March, 2014.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?