Carrillo v. Roegler

Filing 70

ORDER accepting the 58 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/7/21. (kcv, )

Download PDF
Case 1:14-cv-00099-TH-ZJH Document 70 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 196 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION TIMOTHY CARRILLO § VS. § NURSE SHOEMAKER, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14cv99 ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Timothy Carrillo, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Nurse Shoemaker and an unidentified medical supervisor. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending this lawsuit be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff did not object to the Report and Recommendation.1 ORDER The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ACCEPTED as the opinion of the court. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit in accordance with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. SIGNED this the 7 day of September, 2021. ____________________________ Thad Heartfield United States District Judge 1 Plaintiff filed what was docketed as objections. However, plaintiff labeled his document as an answer to the Report and Recommendation, rather than as objections. In his answer, plaintiff states he accepts the recommendation that his claims be dismissed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?