Sanchez v. Womble et al
ORDER adopting 37 and 47 Reports and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/18/17. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JOHN P. SANCHEZ
JOHN WOMBLE, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-242
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff John P. Sanchez, a prisoner previously confined at the United States Penitentiary
in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant
to Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Dr.
John Womble, Dr. Prasad Surapaneni, Dr. Sreedhar Polavarapu, the University of Texas Medical
Branch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., and Danials .
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing the claims against defendants Polavarapu, Samuels,
Danials, and the University of Texas Medical Branch without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). The Magistrate Judge also recommended dismissing the claims against
defendant Womble and Surapaneni pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The court has received and considered the Reports and Recommendations of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections
to the Reports and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and the reports of the Magistrate Judge (document nos. 37 and 47) are ADOPTED. A final
judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
So Ordered and Signed
Sep 18, 2017
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?