Samuel v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 43

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and the Johnson Defendants' "Motion for Summary Judgement" is granted. Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/15/15. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MATTHEWS SAMUEL, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-cv-473 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On October 22, 2014, the court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters. (Doc. No. 19.) Defendants Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Janssen Research and Development, L.L.C. (collectively, “Johnson Defendants”) filed a “Motion for Summary Judgment” (Doc. No. 27) on February 24, 2015. The court has received and considered the report (Doc. No. 41) of the magistrate judge, who recommends the court grant the Johnson Defendants’ motion. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. The court’s independent review confirms that the magistrate judge’s analysis is correct. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Doc. No. 41) is ADOPTED and the Johnson Defendants’ “Motion for Summary Judgment” . (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED. Final judgment will be entered separately. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 15th day of September, 2015. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?