Gaddis v. Wilkinson et al
ORDER adopting 46 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 10/24/16. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CHERRY GADDIS, JR.
JASON WILKINSON, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-20
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Cherry Gaddis, Jr., a former pre-trial detainee at the Jasper County Jail, proceeding
pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against
defendants Sheriff Mitchell Newman and Sergeant Jason Wilkinson.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge,
at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The
Magistrate Judge recommends defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.1
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are
correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered
Plaintiff received the Report and Recommendation on August 30, 2016. On or about September 2, 2016,
plaintiff mailed a motion for extension of time to file objections which was granted, in part. Plaintiff sought sixty (60)
additional days to file his objections. The Magistrate Judge granted the motion giving plaintiff an additional thirty (30)
days to file his objections to the Report and Recommendation. This order was filed September 8, 2016. No objections
have been received to date.
in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
So Ordered and Signed
Oct 24, 2016
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?