Andrews v. United States of America

Filing 5

ORDER adopting 2 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's 1 Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 4/18/15. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION DESHAWN ANDREWS § VS. § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-78 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner DeShawn Andrews, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the action. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 2) is ADOPTED. Petitioner’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus (document no. 1) is DENIED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 18 day of April, 2015. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?