Vazquez v. Hamilton et al
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION Regarding Venue. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 5/14/15. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
ALBERTO VASQUEZ
§
VS.
§
KATHLEEN HAMILTON, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv117
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING VENUE
Plaintiff Alberto Vasquez, an inmate confined at the Montgomery County Jail in Conroe,
Texas, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against
Kathleen Hamilton, Darla Faulkner, and Matthew Brown.
The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to the United States Magistrate Judge
for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.
Factual Background
Liberally interpreted, plaintiff’s complaint is construed as asserting that the defendants were
participants in the criminal proceeding brought against him which led to his alleged wrongful
conviction and imprisonment.
Analysis
The Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §1981, et seq., under which this case is brought, does not
contain a specific venue provision. Accordingly, venue in civil rights cases is controlled by 28
U.S.C. § 1391. Jones v. Bailey, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff’d per curium, 480 F.2d 805 (5th
Cir. 1973).
When, as in this case, jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1391 provides that venue is proper only in the judicial district where the defendants reside or in
which the claim arose. Here, plaintiff complains of incidents which occurred in Conroe, Texas.
Further, the defendants are all located in Montgomery County, Texas. When public officials are
parties to an action in their official capacities, they reside for venue purposes in the county where
they perform their official duties, which in this case is Montgomery County. Holloway v. Gunnell,
685 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1982); Lowrey v. Estelle, 433 F.2d 265 (5th Cir. 1976).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 124, Montgomery County is located in the Houston Division of the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Accordingly, venue for such claims
is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas.
When venue is not proper, the court “shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice,
transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. §
1406(a). The claims should be transferred to the Southern District of Texas. An appropriate order
so providing will be entered by the undersigned.
Hello This is a Test
SIGNED this 14 day of
May
, 2015.
KEITH F. GIBLIN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?