Milton v. Daniels

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied. Petitioner will have 30 days to pay the requisite $5 filing fee. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/16/15. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT GREGORY A. MILTON, Petitioner, versus WARDEN, USP BEAUMONT, Respondent. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-140 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner, Gregory A. Milton, a federal prisoner currently confined at USP Beaumont, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date. Petitioner, however, has also not paid the requisite $5 filing fee in this action. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Petitioner will have thirty (30) days to pay the requisite $5 filing fee. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action . for want of prosecution. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 16th day of July, 2015. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?