Mendoza v. Kanely

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/7/16. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALVINO L. MENDOZA, JR., Plaintiff, versus WALTER CONNEALY, Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-142 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Alvino L. Mendoza, Jr., a prisoner confined at the Hightower Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Walter Connealy. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#19) is ADOPTED. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (#12) is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in . accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2016. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?