City of Port Arthur v. Daimler Buses North Carolina, Inc.

Filing 76

ORDER adopting 69 Report and Recommendation and granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Pltf's claims are dismissed with prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/26/18. (tkd, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CITY OF PORT ARTHUR, Plaintiff, versus DAIMLER BUSES NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-186 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin for consideration of and recommended disposition on case-dispositive pretrial motions. On July 12, 2018, Judge Giblin issued his report and recommendation in which he recommended that the Court grant Defendant Daimler Buses North Carolina, Inc.’s (“Daimler”) motion for summary judgment. See Report and Recommendation on Motion for Summary Judgment (#69). The parties have not filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court conducted a de novo review of the magistrate judge’s findings, the record, and the applicable law in this proceeding. After review, the Court finds that Judge Giblin’s findings and recommendations should be accepted. The Court ORDERS that the Report and Recommendation on Motion for Summary Judgment (#69) is ADOPTED. Pursuant to Judge Giblin’s recommendation, the Court ORDERS that Defendant’s Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Further Support (#52) is GRANTED. Plaintiff City of Port Arthur’s claims are DISMISSED in their entirety, with prejudice. The Court will enter final judgment separately. It is further ORDERED that all other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Signed this date Jul 26, 2018 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?