Robinson v. Lara
Filing
15
ORDER overruling objections and adopting 5 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 5/6/16. (tkd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
NOAH R. ROBINSON
§
VS.
§
FRANK LARA
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv326
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Petitioner Noah R. Robinson, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled petition for writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
The Court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this
court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge regarding this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the petition be
dismissed.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. Petitioner filed objections to the Report
and Recommendation.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings
and the applicable law. After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion petitioner’s
objections are without merit. The Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that the grounds for
review asserted by petitioner do not provide him with a basis for relief in a petition filed pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
ORDER
Accordingly, petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is
ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6 day of May, 2016.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?