Colone v. Woods et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION # 25 that plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief, denial of grievances, confiscation of property without due process of law and harassment be dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/19/17. (mrp, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MITCH WOODS, et al.,
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-113
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, Joseph Colone, a former pre-trial detainee at the Jefferson County Correctional
Facility, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief, denial of grievances,
confiscation of property without due process of law, and harassment be dismissed as frivolous and
for failure to state a claim.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No
objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1
Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on July 31, 2017 (docket entry no. 27).
Although plaintiff amended his complaint on September 14, 2017 (docket entry no. 30), this was in response
to the Magistrate Judge’s order to replead filed July 25, 2017, concerning other claims (docket entry no. 26).
A review of the amended complaint reveals no substantive objections to the Report and Recommendation filed
July 31, 2017.
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 19th day of September, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?