Sanders v. Waldrop

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this civil rights action be dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 12/21/16. (mrp, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TOMMY SANDERS, Plaintiff, versus SHERRY WALDROP, PAROLE OFFICER, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-130 MEMORANDUM ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Tommy Sanders, an inmate confined with the South Texas ISF Institution, with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s civil rights action be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1 1 Petitioner received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on or before October 11, 2016 (docket entry no. 6). ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 21st day of December, 2016. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?