Mattox v. Owens et al

Filing 9

ORDER overruling plaintiff's objections and adopting the magistrate judge's 6 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/11/2016. (bjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION MICHAEL MATTOX § VS. § JEROME OWENS, ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-135 ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Michael Mattox, a prisoner confined at the Ellis Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jerome Owens, Robert Choate, and Edward Tracy. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. The court received correspondence from the plaintiff, which the court liberally construes as objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The court has conducted a de novo review of the “objections” in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). Plaintiff’s letter does not object to the substance of the Report and Recommendation, or even attempt to show that his conviction has been reversed, but rather reiterates what he claims to be his damages. After careful consideration, the court concludes the “objections” are without merit. ORDER Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections (document no. 8) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 6) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So Ordered and Signed Sep 11, 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?