Canales v. Davis et al

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 19 Report and Recommendation.. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/25/2017. (bjc, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RAMIRO CANALES, Plaintiff, versus VIVIAN L. DAVIS, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-140 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Ramiro Canales, an inmate confined at the Mark Stiles Unit, with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s claims against defendants Davis, Bassett, Livingston, Powell, Woodard, Baldwin, Schuyler, Conley, Brown, Boykin and John/Jane Doe I should be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) without prejudice. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1 1 Plaintiff received a copy of the Report and Recommendation on July 5, 2017 (docket entry no. 20). ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A partial judgment will be entered in this . case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 25th day of July, 2017. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?