United States of America v. 5124 Gumwood Avenue, McAllen, Hidalgo County, Texas
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 23 Report and Recommendation. The Court therefore ORDERS that Judge Giblin's Report and Recommendation (#23) is ADOPTED. The Motion to Strike V erified Claim of Hermila E. Correa (#21) is DENIED. The Court further ORDERS that the pending Motion for Entry of Final Judgment of Forfeiture (#15) is denied as moot, without prejudice to reassert, as recommended by the magistrate judge. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/1/2017. (kls, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
5124 GUMWOOD AVENUE, MCALLEN,
HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-186
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, for consideration. On August 10, 2017, Judge Giblin issued a Report and Recommendation
in which he recommended that the Court deny the United States’ motion to strike claimant Hermila
E. Correa’s claim in this forfeiture case.
To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)
and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court conducted a de novo review of the magistrate
judge’s report and the record in this cause. The Court agrees with Judge Giblin’s recommended
disposition. The Court therefore ORDERS that Judge Giblin’s Report and Recommendation (#23)
is ADOPTED. The Motion to Strike Verified Claim of Hermila E. Correa (#21) is DENIED.
The Court further ORDERS that the pending Motion for Entry of Final Judgment of Forfeiture
(#15) is denied as moot, without prejudice to reassert, as recommended by the magistrate judge.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 1st day of September, 2017.
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?