Arthur v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al

Filing 38

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING 36 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 1/2/2018. (bjc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THEODORE ROOSEVELT ARTHUR, Plaintiff, versus LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-220 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Theodore Roosevelt Arthur, an inmate formerly confined at the Larry Gist Unit, with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s remaining claims be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1 1 A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable on November 29, 2017 (docket entry no. 37). ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 2nd day of January, 2018. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?