Evans v. Robinson et al

Filing 22

ORDER overruling objections and adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/27/17. (tkd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION BOBBY DEWAYNE EVANS § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16cv374 WINGROVE FELTON ROBINSON, ET AL. § ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Bobby Dewayne Evans, an inmate at the McConnell Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42. U.S.C. § 1983. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed as frivolous. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff’s objections are without merit. For the reasons set forth in the Report, plaintiff’s complaint is frivolous. ORDER Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in the above-styled action in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 27 day of September, 2017. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?