Vargas v. Beaumont Medical Administration et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Beaumont Medical Administration and the Bureau of Prisons be dismissed from this action. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 12/7/17. (mrp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
RAMON VARGAS
§
VS.
§
BEAUMONT MEDICAL ADMIN., ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO.
1:16-CV-498
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Ramon Vargas, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in
Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action against the
Beaumont Medical Administration, David St. Clair, H. Plessala, the Bureau of Prisons, Harmoush
Issam, and the United States of America.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the Beaumont Medical
Administration and the Bureau of Prisons from this action.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 16) is ADOPTED.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the Beaumont Medical Administration and the Bureau of Prisons from
this action (document no. 13) is GRANTED. A partial judgment will be entered in this case in
accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation.
So Ordered and Signed
Dec 7, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?