Vargas v. Beaumont Medical Administration et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Beaumont Medical Administration and the Bureau of Prisons be dismissed from this action. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 12/7/17. (mrp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION RAMON VARGAS § VS. § BEAUMONT MEDICAL ADMIN., ET AL. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-498 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Ramon Vargas, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil action against the Beaumont Medical Administration, David St. Clair, H. Plessala, the Bureau of Prisons, Harmoush Issam, and the United States of America. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends granting plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the Beaumont Medical Administration and the Bureau of Prisons from this action. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (document no. 16) is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the Beaumont Medical Administration and the Bureau of Prisons from this action (document no. 13) is GRANTED. A partial judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. So Ordered and Signed Dec 7, 2017   2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?