Thompson v. Does et al
Filing
12
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to sanctions imposed by the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 1/14/19. (mrp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
ARTHUR JOHN THOMPSON, JR.
§
VS.
§
JANE DOE, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17cv169
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Arthur John Thompson, Jr., proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights
action. The court previously referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable
orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge recommending this lawsuit be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to
sanctions imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation, along with the
record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections. After careful review of
plaintiff’s objections, the court is of the opinion the objections are without merit.
ORDER
Accordingly, plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as
the opinion of the court. A final judgment shall be entered in accordance with the recommendation
of the Magistrate Judge.
SIGNED this the 14 day of January, 2019.
____________________________
Thad Heartfield
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?