Nelson v. Attorney General of Texas
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 25 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 4/30/2020. (bjc, )
Case 1:17-cv-00220-TH-ZJH Document 26 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 90
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
DAMION KEITH NELSON
§
VS.
§
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-220
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Damion Keith Nelson, an inmate currently confined at the Boyd Unit with the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant the Attorney General of
Texas.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends this civil rights action be dismissed for want of prosecution
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (docket entry no. 25).
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in this case
Case 1:17-cv-00220-TH-ZJH Document 26 Filed 04/30/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 91
in accordance with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations.
SIGNED this the 30 day of April, 2020.
____________________________
Thad Heartfield
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?