Mendez v. United States of America
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 3 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is transferred to the Beaumont Division of the Eastern District of Texas. (Signed by Judge Micaela Alvarez) Parties notified.(BelindaSaenz, 7) [Transferred from Texas Southern on 9/21/2017.]
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
September 21, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUAN CARLOS MENDEZ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIVIL ACTION NO.
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CRIM. ACTION NO. M-15-1367-1
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court is Petitioner Juan Carlos Mendez‟s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which had been referred to the Magistrate Court for a
report and recommendation. On August 23, 2017, the Magistrate Court issued the Report and
Recommendation, recommending that Petitioner‟s § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus be
transferred to the Beaumont Division of the Eastern District of Texas. The time for filing
objections has passed and no objections have been filed.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Report and
Recommendation for clear error.1 Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner‟s § 2241
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is transferred to the Beaumont Division of the Eastern
District of Texas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE at McAllen, Texas, this 21st day of September, 2017.
United States District Judge
As noted by the Fifth Circuit, “[t]he advisory committee‟s note to Rule 72(b) states that, „[w]hen no timely objection is filed,
the [district] court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the
recommendation.‟” Douglas v. United Servs. Auto. Ass‟n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)
advisory committee‟s note (1983)) superceded by statute on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), as stated in ACS Recovery
Servs., Inc. v. Griffin, No. 11-40446, 2012 WL 1071216, at *7 n.5 (5th Cir. Apr. 2, 2012).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?