Murphy v. Davis et al
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/17/2020. (bjc, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
THOMAS LAMONT MURPHY,
Plaintiff,
versus
FELICIAR DAVIS, et al.,
Defendants.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-431
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff, Thomas Lamont Murphy, an inmate formerly confined at the Hightower Unit
with the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro
se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983 against
defendants Feliciar Davis, David Montgomery, Mary Gilder, Wayne Brewer and Steve Massie.
The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court.
The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing plaintiff’s civil rights action for want of
prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (docket entry no. 29).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No
objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed to date.1
1
A copy of the Report and Recommendation was returned with the notation “unable to forward” on June 19,
2020 (docket entry no. 30).
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in
accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 17th day of September, 2020.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?