Motton v. Bureau of Prisons et al
Filing
7
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 6 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Ron Clark on 3/23/2018. (bjc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
CHARLES WILLIAM MOTTON, III
§
VS.
§
BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-CV-453
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff, Charles William Motton, an inmate confined at FCI Forrest City, proceeding pro
se, filed this Bivens-type1 action against defendants.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge,
at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The
Magistrate Judge recommends plaintiff’s claims be dismissed for want of prosecution as plaintiff
has failed to pay the full filing fee and/or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed to date.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct,
and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A Final Judgment will be entered in
accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23 day of March, 2018.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
1
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?