Richitelli v. Lara

Filing 32

ORDERED that the 31 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in full. It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 11/28/2017.(BAR) [Transferred from Arizona on 11/30/2017.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jay Anthony Richitelli, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-15-00410-TUC-RM John T Shartle, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 On November 6, 2017, Magistrate Judge Velasco issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (Doc. 31) recommending that this Court transfer this action to the 17 United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. No objections to the Report 18 and Recommendation were filed. 19 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 20 magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 21 objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 72(b) 22 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is filed, 23 the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in 24 order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 25 advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 26 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the 27 district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, 28 CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for 1 clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation). 2 The Court has reviewed Judge Velasco’s Report and Recommendation, the 3 parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Velasco’s Report and 4 Recommendation. Accordingly, 5 6 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is accepted and adopted in full. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the 8 above-captioned action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 9 Texas. 10 Dated this 28th day of November, 2017. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?