Wesley v. Lewis

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM ORDER overruling petitioner's objections and adopting the magistrate judge's 14 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 2/3/2021. (bjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION MONTARIAL WESLEY § VS. § WARDEN LEWIS § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-22 MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS AND THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Montarial Wesley, a prisoner previously confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends denying the petition. The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. The petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration of all the pleadings and the relevant case law, the court concludes that the petitioner’s objections lack merit. ORDER Accordingly, the petitioner’s objections (document no. 15) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 14) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Order. SIGNED this the 3 day of February, 2021. ____________________________ Thad Heartfield United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?