Mayes v. Stepheson et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 12 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 12/11/2018. (bjc, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DAVID TODD MAYES, Plaintiff, versus ZENA STEPHENS, et al., Defendants. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-162 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff David Todd Mayes, a prisoner confined at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sheriff Zena Stephens, Major Turner, Lieutenant Hawkins, Lieutenant Marris, Sergeant Neighbors, and Correct Care Solutions. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#12) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 11th day of December, 2018. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?