Roberts v. Lara et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the 13 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/7/21. (kcv, )
Case 1:18-cv-00258-TH-ZJH Document 16 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 63
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EUGENE ISIAH ROBERTS
FRANK LARA, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-258
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Eugene Isiah Roberts, a prisoner previously confined at the United States
Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), against Frank
Lara and C. Hadnot.
The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of
this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the
Case 1:18-cv-00258-TH-ZJH Document 16 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 64
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,
and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 13) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be
entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
SIGNED this the 7 day of September, 2021.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?