Gonzalez-Robles v. Leage Medical Concepts et al
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the 19 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/8/21. (kcv, )
Case 1:18-cv-00408-TH-KFG Document 22 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 220
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
ALVERTO GONZALEZ-ROBLES
§
VS.
§
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-408
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Alverto Gonzalez-Robles, a prisoner previously confined at the Federal Correctional
Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to the
Federal Tort Claims Act and Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971).
The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of
this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e).
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. No
objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the
parties.
Case 1:18-cv-00408-TH-KFG Document 22 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 221
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,
and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 19) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be
entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
SIGNED this the 8 day of September, 2021.
____________________________
Thad Heartfield
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?