Watson v. Daniels et al

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The claim against UTMB is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 5/9/22. (ljw, )

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-00093-MAC-ZJH Document 21 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 181 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RONNELLE WATSON, Plaintiff, versus PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT DANIELS, Defendant. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-93 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Ronnelle Watson, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit against Physician Assistant Daniels and the University of Texas Medical Branch (“UTMB”). The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of the court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the claim against UTMB be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. The claim against UTMB is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed this date May 9, 2022

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?