Watson v. Daniels et al
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The claim against UTMB is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 5/9/22. (ljw, )
Case 1:20-cv-00093-MAC-ZJH Document 21 Filed 05/09/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 181
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
RONNELLE WATSON,
Plaintiff,
versus
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT DANIELS,
Defendant.
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-93
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Ronnelle Watson, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled lawsuit against Physician
Assistant Daniels and the University of Texas Medical Branch (“UTMB”). The court referred this
matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for
consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of the court. The magistrate judge has
submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending the
claim against UTMB be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
The court has received the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,
along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. No objections were filed to the
Report and Recommendation.
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct
and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court. The claim
against UTMB is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Signed this date
May 9, 2022
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?