Schindler v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 1/6/2021. (bjc, )
Case 1:20-cv-00162-MJT-KFG Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 107
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BEAUMONT DIVISION
CHARLES SCHINDLER
§
VS.
§
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-162
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Petitioner Charles Schindler, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in
Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241.
The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate
Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court.
The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge. The magistrate judge recommends granting the petitioner’s motion to dismiss the petition
without prejudice.
The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. Proper notice
was given to the petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(c). No objections
to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.
Case 1:20-cv-00162-MJT-KFG Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 108
ORDER
Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct,
and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 13) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be
entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
SIGNED this 6th day of January, 2021.
____________________________
Michael J. Truncale
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?