Schindler v. Warden, FCI Beaumont

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 13 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 1/6/2021. (bjc, )

Download PDF
Case 1:20-cv-00162-MJT-KFG Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 107 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION CHARLES SCHINDLER § VS. § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-162 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Charles Schindler, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends granting the petitioner’s motion to dismiss the petition without prejudice. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and the pleadings. Proper notice was given to the petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(c). No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. Case 1:20-cv-00162-MJT-KFG Document 14 Filed 01/06/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 108 ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (document no. 13) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. SIGNED this 6th day of January, 2021. ____________________________ Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?