Hamby v. Wright et al
MEMORANDUM ORDER overruling objections and adopting 66 Report and Recommendation. Defts' 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Signed by District Judge Thad Heartfield on 9/16/22. (tkd, )
Case 1:20-cv-00185-TH-ZJH Document 70 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1865
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
MARK J. RICHARDS, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:20-CV-185
MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING
THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Jackie Hamby brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against
Mark J. Richards and Robert Behrns.
The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States
Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of
this court. The magistrate judge recommends granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge, along with the record and the pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate
judge’s Report and Recommendation.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and
the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the
objections are without merit.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s objections (document no. 69) are OVERRULED. The findings of
fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge
(document no. 66) is ADOPTED. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (document no. 53)
Case 1:20-cv-00185-TH-ZJH Document 70 Filed 09/16/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1866
is GRANTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate
SIGNED this the 16 day of September, 2022.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?