Ross v. United States of America

Filing 27

MEMORANDUM ORDER Adopting the 25 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 9/24/24. (kcv) cc: Ross via USPS on 9/25/24.

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION ROBERT ROSS § VS. § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21cv607 MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Robert Ross, formerly an inmate at the United States Penitentiary located in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing this action without prejudice. The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at the address provided to the Court. The copy of the Report mailed to Plaintiff was returned to the Court with a notation that Plaintiff is no longer at the address. Plaintiff, however, has failed to provide the Court with a new address at which he may be contacted. As of this date, no objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge have been filed. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendations. SIGNED this 24th day of September, 2024. ____________________________ Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?