Escobedo v. Warden, TDCJ-CID

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 6/3/2024. (KMH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT RAMIRO ESCOBEDO, Petitioner, versus WARDEN, FCI BEAUMONT, Respondent. EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:24-CV-92 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Petitioner Ramiro Escobedo, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Christine L. Stetson, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. On April 25, 2024, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the petition without prejudice for want of prosecution. Proper notice was given to Petitioner at his last known address. See FED. R. CIV. P. 5(b)(2)(C). To date, the parties have not filed objections to the report. The court received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. After careful review, the court finds that the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the United States Magistrate Judge are correct. ORDER Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#6) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 3rd day of June, 2024. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?