Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 116

NOTICE of Disclosure by Concord Camera Corporation (Albritton, Eric)

Download PDF
Compression Labs Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 116 Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 116 Filed 09/29/2004 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Compression Labs, Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Agfa Corporation, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:04-CV-158-DF NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(a)(1) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Concord Camera Corp., defendant in the above-entitled and numbered civil action, certifies that on September 29, 2004, it complied with Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Respectfully Submitted, ______________________________ Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 Albritton Law Firm P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 (903) 757-8449 (phone) (903) 758-7397 (fax) eric@albrittonlawfirm.com 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00158-DF Document 116 Filed 09/29/2004 Page 2 of 2 Of Counsel: Scott L. Lampert Florida State Bar No. 0085642 4000 Hollywood Blvd. Ste. 650N Hollywood, Florida 33021 (954) 331-4200 (phone) (954) 989-4103 (fax) kerry_sisselman@concord-camera.com scott_lampert@concord-camera.com Attorneys for Defendant Concord Camera, Corp. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email on this the 29th day of September, 2004. ______________________________ Eric M. Albritton 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?